This was the missing excerpt:
<span>Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes his aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces; but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered—that of neither has been answered fully.
</span>
This was the missing choices:
A) logical fallacy
B) extended metaphor
C) parallel structure
<span>D) rhetorical question
</span>
The rhetorical device Lincoln used to emphasize that everyone has a stake in the war is C. PARALLEL STRUCTURE.
He compared the expectations and desires of both parties using the parallel structure to show that the concerns were of the same level of importance.
The name of the exam was called the "Six Second Exam." The thing that the doctors detected were: <span>mental defects, disease or deformity, some definite disease, back problems, trauma,heart problems, pregnancy, eye disease </span>
<span>Sharecropping is a risky venture for both the sharecropper and the farmer. Just to be clear, the large farmer leases some of his land on speculation to a smaller farmer in return for part of the potential profits after harvest. If it's a good crop, both do OK. If there's a crop failure, or the market is down come autumn, both are SOL. The sharecropper's farm was small enough that he couldn't possibly get rich, unless some miracle happened in the market, but he had all to lose. And farming has never been easy work.</span>
