Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: a person with a high opportunity cost of time.
Explanation:
To begin with, the opportunity cost of something is what the person sacrificies in order to be doing that thing. Therefore that when we talk about the opportunity cost of time it refers to what the person sacrificies in order to do something with that time. If the person has a high opportunity cost of time then the sacrificies that he made with that time will be higher than other person that has a low opportunity cost of time, meaning that the time spent by that person is less important than to the one that has a lot of time to spare.
Answer:
Title VII of the CRA
Explanation:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) is a landmark federal law that aims to protect employees against discrimination based on race, colour, sex, nation of origin, or religion.
The act was made law in 1964.
In the given scenario a female sales representative with excellent performance review was not promoted for 8 years, while Jim a male sales representative was promoted in just 18 months.
This is a gender based discrimination and is covered by Title VII of the CRA.
Age discrimination does not apply because it addresses discrimination of employees with minimum age of 40 years.
Equity act requires that employees on the same job role are compensated equally. This does not also apply.
Rehabilitation act prevents discrimination based on disability. This does not also apply
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Brazilian tomato producers are worse off.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good and service if its opportunity cost of producing that good and service is lower than that of its trading partner. So it is better off for a country that has a lower opportunity cost in production a good or service to specialise in that good or service.
Brazil has a comparative advantage in coffee production, meaning, it is better off in specialising in the production of coffee and will be worse off if Brazil specialises in Tomato
Mexico has a comparative advantage is Tomato, meaning, she is better off in specialising in Tomato and worse off if she specialises in Coffee
Answer:
Specific performance
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the order that Wally should seek is known as Specific performance. This is a court order which forces the breaching party to perform the agreed upon act, and by doing so complete the agreed upon specifications set forth by the contract. Failure to do so will find the individual in contempt of court.
I believe The only legal filing status for Molly will be a qualifying widow.
Hope this helps !
