Declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
I think it was because of where it was. It had more control and had more to help them. I might not be 100% but thats what I could say.
Answer:
I think just the right amount.
Explanation:
The reason for me thinking this is that you may think the president has no boss but in fact, us as the people are their boss. They do tend to make really bad decisions often but somehow were all still here so it must have worked out in the end...
Answer:
The conflict between Henry IV and Gregory VII concerned the question of who got to appoint local church officials. Henry believed that, as king, he had the right to appoint the bishops of the German church. This was known as lay investiture.
Explanation:
A code of behavior for knights in medieval Europe, stressing ideals such as courage, loyalty, and devotion. How did Pope Gregory show his power in political affairs? Under Gregory, the papacy also became a secular, or worldly, power involved in, they used church revenues to raise armies, repair road, and help the poor.
