Answer:
It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles
Explanation:
it is nobler to die with integrity then to live with principles that harm other strongly support the statement that men with integrity does not compromise with his principles he is self made person and he believes in his abilities and work on his own principles on the other side a man who compromises on his principles usually lacks confidence and is not capable enough to believe on his own abilities and is not able to make decisions on his own on the other side a man with integrity confidence is capable enough to even handle difficult of situation and can manage every problem very well as this phrase is mostly quoted in most of the texts
REBECCA NURSE a famous religious author also quoted as same that "It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles that harm others" being a religious and follower of GOD she came on to the conclusion that in living with integrity is that what matters
The correct answer among the choices listed above is option D. A political unit or body of people living within a specific territory under one federal government is defined as a state. It is composed of an executive, a bureaucracy, courts and other institutions.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The two analytical frameworks that sport historians begin to use in the 1970s to make sense of data they collected in their research of the history of physical activity were modernization theory and human agency.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to delve down into the nuances of the development of sports through different times, the sports historians found it necessary to study the details of the process of modernization. This study helped them determine how modernization helped sports to get shaped to their modern forms.
- Their study also included how different sports were taken forward by humans as the carrying agents of the sports and the changes that happened to sports during the process of carrying forward generation to generation.
I would choose "representative democracy" as the best answer- this is the most typical example for what you described
Some other forms would also qualify in some cases, for example The Vatican city (Theocracy and absolute ?monarchy?) also has an elective leader, albeit for life.
but "representative democracy" is best.
Examples of representative democracy: US, Germany, UK.
