"Creating the post offices" is the one among the following choices given in the question that <span>is an example of an expressed power. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.</span>
Explanation:
Social development is about improving the well-being of every individual in society so they can reach their full potential.
For example, a developmental change in how people behave with members of the other gender or their understanding of what friendship entails.
1. I believe the primary focus is: To show color outside of white and black by taking photographs of the <span>subjects face. Dass aimed to eliminate the prejudice that we have on which skin color is considered better and bring the audience to see the beauty in the human geniune expression rather than the color alone.
2. Yes, i think it would be considered as a potraits.
A potratis is a picture of an individual. Since the expression shown is part of the individuals themselves, i would argue that the artwork could be conisidered as a ptraits.
3. </span>She says they help us rethink color and the person behind the skin. She wants people to be seen for their heart and personally, she believed that her artworks would help the society to eliminate racism/social prejudices that we imposed to other people simply based on the color of their skin
4. Some of the noticable guidelines that she adhered to were:
- Taking some candid photos in order to show the natural expression from the people in the portrait.
- Making sure that the portraits have clear backgrounds in order to bring the focus to the individuals.
5. I would say that we can learn about the struggles that people in shelters /refugee camp face as the additional lesson from the photos.
With this lesson, the photographers conveys that we should try to get in touch with our humanistic value and make some efforts to help them elevate some of their miseries.
6. The technique would be to <span>Center the subject.
Centering the subject would provide a better frame for the main pictures that the creator wish to dominate the frame.
Doing this would directly focus the attention of the viewer at the subject that we want to bring up the most.
7. This technique is very good for a portrait because </span><span>It minimizes the distraction, and it adds impact to the image.
And often times, this technique would make the audiences aware of the details that they might miss under normal circumstances.
8. When using this technique, the subject eyes should be located </span><span>In a horizontal line and a vertical third line.
This location would most likely provide equal spacing in the top, bottom, left, and right part of the background and would place the face/expression of the portraits as the main focus in the frame.
9. Personally, No.
Using this perspective in the photograph would make face seems to big to be considered as 'aesthetically pleasing'.
On top of that, this perspective also make it difficult to observe the body language of the figure in the portrait.</span>
The king and Parliament viewed the colonies as production factories for the crown. They were not seen as British citizens.
Answer: The best answer is C. Usually compared to lion, Andrew Jackson was a very controlling president and was usually compared to a king because of his actions. He vetoed more than the 6 presidents before him combined. A would imply that Jackson let the Native Americans have the land when he did not. B was the opposite of what really happened. C was somewhat close in that the Cherokee did lose the case( not originally but after Jackson repealed it) but they did not ask Jackson for help. He rather forced them out of the land in the Trail of Tears.
Explanation:
