It mention the sharing of wealth in time of grate poverty
Answer:
If I were to add something that would make my argument against slavery more convincing I would probably say something like what is the roles were switched, would you want to be a slave?
When people went to Africa or when they bought slaves they would often say something like it was in the bible and because of this that it was okay when this was not true so you could possibly use that to help your argument against it. There are probably better answers out there but I wrote a argument against slavery once and I used this stuff in and got a pretty good grade.
Generally speaking, in the United States, conformity and the consumer culture of the 1950s were both supported by "economic prosperity," since for the first time in a while, people had the means to purchase luxury goods. <span />
The act of 1813 which states. The East India Company Act 1813, also known as the Charter Act of 1813, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdomwhich renewed the charter issued to the British East India Company, and continued the Company's rule in India. However, the Company's commercial monopoly was ended, except for the tea trade and the trade with China. Reflecting the growth of British power in India,
1. The Act expressly asserted the Crown's sovereignty over British India.
2. It allotted Rs 100,000 to promote education in Indian masses and allowed them to open anywhere anytime.
3. This act permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English and preach their religion.
The power of the provincial governments and courts in India over European British subjects was also strengthened by the Act.[2]Financial provision was also made to encourage a revival in Indian literature and for the promotion of science.[3]
The Company's charter had previously been renewed by the Charter Act of 1793, and was next renewed by the Charter Act of 1833.
Answer: Strongly anti-communist
Explanation:
