1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreyandreev [35.5K]
3 years ago
5

Mr. Weber drives to a landscape supply center to buy sand and gravel. He needs at least 2 lb of sand. The amount of gravel he wi

ll buy will be at least twice the amount of sand he will buy. The center has 6 lb of sand and 13 lb of gravel in stock.
The graph shows the feasible region, where x represents the number of pounds of sand and y represents the number of pounds of gravel.

Which ordered pairs meet all the constraints and make sense in the context of the situation?

Select each correct answer.



(2 1/2, 10)

(3, 12)

(4,6)

(5, 8 1/2)
Mathematics
2 answers:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
3 0

The answers are (2 1/2, 10) and (3, 12)

//I just took the test and these were the answers

mariarad [96]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

(2 1/2, 10) and (3, 12).

Step-by-step explanation:

The variable x represents the number of pounds of sand.  Mr. Weber needs at least 2 pounds of sand; this gives us the inequality

x ≥ 2

The center has only 6 lb of sand; this gives us the inequality

x ≤ 6, as he cannot buy more than they have.

The variable y represents the amount of gravel he buys.  The center has only 13 lb of gravel in stock; this gives us the inequality

y ≤ 13, as he cannot buy more than they have.

Mr. Weber will buy at least twice as much gravel (y) as sand (x); this gives us the inequality

y ≥ 2x

The first ordered pair, (2 1/2, 10), fits the first inequality because 2 1/2 ≥ 2.

It fits the second inequality because 2 1/2 ≤ 6.

It fits the third inequality because 10 ≤ 13.

It fits the fourth inequality because 10 ≥ 2(2 1/2), or 10 ≥ 5.

The second ordered pair fits the first inequality because 3 ≥ 2.  It fits the second inequality because 3 ≤ 6.  It fits the third inequality because 12 ≤ 13.  It fits the fourth inequality because 12 ≥ 2(3), or 12 ≥ 6.

The third ordered pair fits the first inequality because 4 ≥ 2.  It fits the second inequality because 4 ≤ 6.  It fits the third inequality because 6 ≤ 13.  It does not, however, fit the last inequality because 6 is not greater than or equal to 2(4) or 8.

The fourth ordered pair fits the first ordered pair because 5 ≥ 2.  It fits the second ordered pair because 5 ≤ 6.  It fits the third inequality because

8 1/2 ≤ 13.  It does not, however, fit the last inequality because 8 1/2 is not larger than 5(2) or 10.

You might be interested in
Correct answers only please! I keep loosing points...
forsale [732]

Answer:

$ 7,299.92

Step-by-step explanation:

A = $ 7,299.92

A = P + I where

P (principal) = $ 6,000.00

I (interest) = $ 1,299.92

8 0
3 years ago
What is the minimum value of the function g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12?<br> -21<br> 3+ V21<br> 3<br> 3-21
kirill [66]

Answer:

g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12? g (2) = x2 - 6x – 12?

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Troy lives in California. He bought a pair of shoes made in China. Which statement describes the shoes?
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

His shoes were made in China.  Certainly that describes the shoes at least partially.

5 0
3 years ago
Someone help me out with this and please get it all correct.
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

9(2+1)=18+9

9(5-2)=45-18

4(1-8)=4-32

9(2=9)=18+81

6 0
3 years ago
Rewrite the radical expression as an exponential expression, and then simplify.
sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

Answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

just did the test

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 14.95 divided by 65 show your estimation and check
    12·1 answer
  • After a price reduction of 20%, the sale price of an item is $16. A student says, "So, the original price must have been 120% of
    10·1 answer
  • For a person standing 100m from the center of the base of the excel tower, the angle of elevation to the top of the tower is 71.
    15·1 answer
  • Seven more than the product of a number and three is equal to four
    5·1 answer
  • It take Morgan 1/8 of an hour to write a page how many pages can Morgan write in 3/4 of an hour
    5·1 answer
  • Find the area of this circle. Use 3 for .<br> A = r2<br> 12 cm<br> [?] cm2
    8·1 answer
  • What it 34.6​_-7.38=
    7·1 answer
  • How many three-digit numbers can be formed under each condition?
    14·1 answer
  • Samara is purchasing gas at the Gas n' Sip. The gas costs $2.469 per gallon. How much did Samara
    6·1 answer
  • Before his shopping spree, Jim owned 133
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!