Machine guns, poison gas, tanks!
Answer:
A.european settlers fled to the US
Explanation:
bc Europeans fled her in the Philippines first then go to the US
Answer:
Rome was important in the Renaissance for two reasons. First and foremost, ancient Roman learning provided the impetus for new developments in science, art, architecture, and political theory, to name but four fields of study. The rediscovery of the wisdom of the past considerably broadened the horizons of European men, opening up vast new intellectual vistas that had previously lain hidden for centuries. The rediscovery of Roman ideas, in particular, allowed Renaissance men to reconnect with a culture and a heritage long thought to be lost forever.
And that leads us on to the second reason why Rome was so important to the Renaissance. The example of Ancient Rome was a reminder to Italians of the glory that had once been their patrimony. The strength, vitality, and dominance of Rome stood in stark contrast to the weak patchwork of warring states that formed the basis of Renaissance Italy.
Renaissance thinkers like Machiavelli lamented the decline of Italy from the glorious heights it had achieved under the Roman Empire to the appalling depths it had plumbed as a political plaything of hostile foreign forces, most notably France. Rome acted as a reminder of what once had been and could be again; it set before the Italian people an example of what could happen if they set aside their differences and came together as one.
It would be several centuries before such an ideal were realized, but right throughout the Renaissance it continued to exercise a powerful hold on the imaginations of millions of Italians.
I believe the emperor of China was influenced by Stalin and his communist movement which led to a rapid development
Answer:
Burke most likely disagreed with the radical course, the French Revolution had taken.
Explanation:
Burke himself was a British member of Parliament of Irish origin. He was supporter of classic liberalism but was equally admired by conservatives.
He also believed in self-determination and was critical of the British actions in the thirteen colonies.
He was also written extensively on the French Revolution and followed it for many years. While he believed in the overall cause of the movement, he did not agree with the extremist approach of the Jacobians.
In a letter, he referred to them as savage men, with very little morals if any.
