<span>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu. And it wasn’t necessary either.
</span>
Cuba and Brazil, your welcome :)
It has the " Me" that represents the expectations and attitudes of others.
And the "I" which represents the person´s individuality as a major instrument of social control.
<u>Answer</u>:
There were many harmful rules and strategies followed and people were harmed badly.
Thats why so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen.
<u>Explanation</u>:
During the late nineteenth century, people disproved the britishers in India. This was because of many violations and harmness caused by them. They started hating them badly. People even felt that is not correct to come to their home land and start conquering and ruling them.
Unfair policies were implemented and indians were treated as slaves of their own country. They hated this descrimination. They were asked to say that only britishers are superior were Indians are not. Their freedom and rights are being pulled off and it is not correct to disrespect people.
Direct causality can be drawn between nationalism and war. ... Nationalist groups within a state who desire their own independent state, (one organised to include their ethnic or cultural identity, for example), may conduct regular or irregular warfare in order to forcibly persuade a state to grant them independence
