Which best explains why the Industrial Revolution led to a larger middle class?

History

1 answer:

Akimi4 [234]3 years ago

4 0

Factories created enormous job opportunities and the workers were paid a lot.

Explanation:

Many businesses and factories were established. As a result if which there were huge job opportunities for the middle class people. They earned a lot and they improved their living conditions. Middle class grew in size and population. Working class gradually got shifted to the next level in the society and the middle class population became large in number.

As the middle class workers started to earn a lot they took advantage of different amenities and they were happy that they could afford it. They lived in a furnished dwelling and purchased clothes and saw to that they lived a comfortable life. Education of children were also possible.

You might be interested in

I need your help PLZZZZZZZZZZZ

tatyana61 [14]

Question

what profession in ancient Greece was not necessary beacuse of the geography of Greece

Answer 

metal working

HEY

have a good day

thank me later

carryonlearing

4 0

2 years ago

Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion at the

const2013 [10]

Answer:

The 3/5ths compromise said that 3/5ths of all slaves would count as free white men for the state population count. This was very unfair as most northern states had very little slaves compared to the Southern states. More people counting towards a states population meant more people representing that state in congress. The great compromise stated that the lower house's number of reps would be based on population of a state and the upper house would be based on equal representation for each state. The northern states didn't like this as they had less people in their states and wanted equal representation so that they wouldn't always be outnumbered by the southern states. The Southern states wanted the opposite.

8 0

3 years ago

What was the first diplomatic crisis of George Washington's presidency? A. whether the U.S. should side with France in its revol

Feliz [49]

A. whether the U.S. should side with France in its revolutionary war with Britain or honor the peace treaty it signed with Britain.

Hope this helps!(:

5 0

3 years ago

What did the supreme court rule about executive agreements in 1937?

yawa3891 [41]

They are lawfully authoritative similarly that bargains are. In spite of inquiries regarding the lawfulness of official assentions, in 1937 the Supreme Court decided that they had an indistinguishable power from settlements. Since official assentions are made on the expert of the officeholder president, they don't really tie his successors.

5 0

2 years ago

Was it right for Hatshepsut to refuse to give up

madreJ [45]

Answer:

Yes, it was as she was the daughter of one pharaoh (Thutmose I) and queen wife of another (her half brother, Thutmose II). When her husband died in 1479 B.C. and her stepson was appointed heir, Hatshepsut dutifully took on the added responsibility of regent to the young Thutmose III

According to custom, Hatshepsut began acting as Thutmose III’s regent, handling affairs of state until her stepson came of age.

Thutmose III went on to rule for 30 more years, proving to be both an ambitious builder like his stepmother and a great warrior. Late in his reign, Thutmose III had almost all of the evidence of Hatshepsut’s rule–including the images of her as king on the temples and monuments she had built–eradicated, possibly to erase her example as a powerful female ruler, or to close the gap in the dynasty’s line of male succession. As a consequence, scholars of ancient Egypt knew little of Hatshepsut’s existence until 1822, when they were able to decode and read the hieroglyphics on the walls of Deir el-Bahri.

4 0

2 years ago