Strict constructionism/interpretation refers to the practice of applying a narrow, or 'strict', interpretation of the U.S. Constitution or other legal texts. Key examples and cases that serve to illustrate strict constructionism include Thomas Jefferson's opposition to Alexander Hamilton's idea of a national bank, the Scott v.
Answer:
The differences between Herodotus and Thucydides are in style, interpretation and purpose. Herodotus passes no judgement, but reports what he has heard, even when plainly ridiculous. ... Thucydides is reporting on war, and war alone.
The US wasn't involved in any physical fighting prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor but we were sending supply convoys to Great Britain.
In short, I believe Darwin's theory was controversial in the 1800s because it contradicted the biblical view of creation.
(Sorry for the shortness.)
xoxo
