No, it is false that during <span>the Paris peace talks, more nations favored a just peace than a peace of vengeance, since in fact it was the other way around (which proved to be a very bad idea). </span>
The difference between ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense is related to the scope of events. In a situation of ensuring domestic tranquility, the US government has a duty to maintain peace within the country's borders.
Providing common defense refers to plans and actions to keep the nation safe from foreign threats, through an effective national army ready to defend the country under any circumstances.
<h3 /><h3>What is the need to promote national security?</h3>
It is essential for the maintenance of a safe country, where each citizen has their human and civil rights protected, by measures and actions of the country's leaders in favor of peace and the quality of life of its citizens.
Therefore, ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense are duties of the government of a country, which must be ready to protect the country from threats that jeopardize its security and sovereignty.
Find out more about National Security here:
brainly.com/question/25375059
#SPJ1
<span>York was Clark’s childhood companion. He was a slave. We know he was big. We know he was very athletic. He was a great dancer. He was devoted to William Clark. He was a great help to the expedition because he was such a curiosity. Indians who had seen white men had never seen a black man before and there’s the famous – is it Catlin or Charley Russell – and there’s the famous Charley Russell painting in the Mandan lodges of the Mandan chief trying to rub the black off of York’s skin. York had a great time on the expedition. He had, had his own rifle. He got to vote. He was a full member of the expedition. He had a, the Indians loved him, and the Indian women especially loved York and he took full advantage of that so that on many occasions York would be missing that night and he would be in the lodge with one of the Indians. Sometimes with the Indian husband standing guard while the business was completed.
</span>
The Pax Romana was said to be a peaceful time of prosperity in Rome. But was all of it really peaceful? No, although Rome wasn't fighting any wars, they still had internal struggle as an empire. After the Civil Wars, Rome went through 27BC-180AD, which is a 200-year period called the Pax Romana, which means peace. The Pax Romana lasted from 27 BC until 180 AD. It started when Augustus Caesar was Emperor (ruler) of the Roman Empire. The main good things that happened in this time were: There were not many wars. Pax Romana which is Latin for "Roman Peace" was a time, as the name suggests, a long period of peace and minimal military expansion from 27 BC to about 180 AD. The main importance was that all of the land surrounding the Mediterranean was at peace because everyone was under Roman Law.
