All categories

3 years ago

Given: A = {18, 6, -3, -12}

1 answer:

5 0

First solve the inequality:
(2/3)x +3< -2x-7
(8/3)x< -10
x< -30/8
x<-15/4 or x< -3.75
now look for the answers which satisfy this, and the answer will be D

You might be interested in

Apply properties of operatione to write an equivalent expression

____ [38]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

All we are doing is combining like terms and since all of then have a "t" in it we would just add the 4 "t's" together like normal addition.

4 0

2 years ago

Joshua's goal is to sell more than 20 items at a farmers' market. So far, he has sold 6 items. Each of his customers buys 2 item

Nookie1986 [14]

The answer is B 20-6=14/2=7

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the value of x? 40 550 A. 1059 B. 75° C. 850 D. 95°

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

the answer is 85° because all angles in a triangle add up to 180

so u add them both up, subtract from 180 n u get 85

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

75 POINTS. I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST.

agasfer [191]

Question 5, x could be either 6 or -1.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does going to a private university increase the chance that a student will graduate with student loan debt? A national poll by t

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.69$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.69$

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=1500 represent the random sample taken

X represent the number of graduates that had student loan debt in 2014

$\hat p=0.71$ estimated proportion of adults that said that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns

$p_o=0.69$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha$ represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that if there was a significant increase in the proportion of student loan debt for public and nonprofit colleges in 2014 respect to the value of 2013.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.69$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.69$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.71 -0.69}{\sqrt{\frac{0.69(1-0.69)}{1500}}}=1.675$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level assumed is $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>1.675)=0.047$

If we compare the p value obtained and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of adults that said that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns is not significantly higher than 0.69.

5 0

3 years ago