A hasty generalization is often associated with which kind of argument?

English

2 answers:

Liula [17]3 years ago

6 0

A hasty generalization is often associated with inductive argument. Option B is correct.

A hasty generalization consists on a fallacy in which a conclusion is not logically justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence. It's also refered to as an insufficient sample, a converse accident, a faulty generalization, a biased generalization, jumping to a conclusion, secundum quid, and a neglect of qualifications. A hasty generalization is an informal fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence.

trapecia [35]3 years ago

3 0

I think it's either B or C. I tried. :)

You might be interested in

EMERGENCY HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! is the phrase in bold a direct object, an indirect object, or neither?

Arturiano [62]

Which phrase is in bold?? when you tell me i’ll answer in comments

3 0

3 years ago

Homer Simpson, a character on the TV show The Simpsons, has a wife who stays home to take care of the children while he works, b

sveta [45]

Answer: Is a symbolic interactionist

Explanation: That is what he does and he is active.

I hope this helps .

8 0

3 years ago

What is one way that Shakespeare uses source material in Othello?

Ivan

D is the answer I think

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which phrase best defines the term direct object A. a word connected to the subject by a linking verb B. an adverb that modif

USPshnik [31]

Direct object is D. A NOUN, PRONOUN, OR WORD GROUP THAT RECEIVES THE ACTION OF THE VERB.

Direct object follows a transitive verb (action verb) not a linking verb. It is always placed after the verb not before it. It receives the action not modifies the action verb.

7 0

3 years ago

When analyzing an argument, which elements should you focus on most? Select three options.

timofeeve [1]

Claim, Reasons,& Evidence

Explanation: Analyzing the Claim is the most important element about the use language in this way is to make claims (true or false) about some state of affairs in the world. One argument is as valid argument only if some of the propositions (the claims) are asserted as supporting the truth of another of the propositions (the conclusion). Those supporting arguments can only be valid if they follow a reasonable structure, with facts and evidences. Because those are the only tools we have to access and dialogue about the reality that surrounds us.

3 0

3 years ago