The maryland toleration act did not bring complete religious freedom, as is so often assumed, and as a reading of this document will quickly prove. nor did it come about because of a profound humanistic conviction on the part of lord baltimore, the maryland proprietor. the act was a pragmatic solution to a serious problem. the catholics in originally catholic maryland had become a minority of the population although still powerful politically. they were in great danger of being ill-treated by the protestant majority. the toleration act, it was believed, was a way of providing protection for catholics while at the same time representing a nod in the direction of the english government, which in 1649 and for a dozen years thereafter was firmly under the control of the english puritans. nonetheless, the document is important because it did provide modest although impermanent protection for catholic marylanders and set a precedent to which others could refer. despite baltimore's catholic background and his desire to use maryland as a refuge for catholics persecuted elsewhere, the catholic church never became the established church. in the eighteenth century this distinction was given to the church of england.
President Bush laid out a few principles of what is known as the "Bush Doctrine" as it relates to foreign policy. The first principle was that the American people should not distinguish between terrorists and the nations in which they live; both should be held accountable. Bush also supported taking the fight to the enemy before they could attack first. He also believed in confronting what he deemed as threats before they were actually made. Finally, Bush believed in advancing "liberty and hope" in reaction against the enemy's beliefs of fear and repression.
this maps shows the areas controlled by Spain, France, and England!
The prime minister is the leader of the party that wins the most seats in general
The answer is c and that comes from personal experience
