Answer:
it will be a net loss of 560,000
It is better to produce at a loss of 60,000 than a loss of 620,000
That's because, the Division cover a good portion of their allocate fixed cost.
Explanation:
The fixed expense are allocate cost. Are unavoidable cost It will remain even if the division is dropped.
The sales and variable cost will be zero.
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&Continued&Discontinued&Differential\\Sales&1,200,000&0&-1,200,000\\Variable&-640,000&0&640,000\\Allocate cost&-620,000&-620,000&0\\Result&-60,000&-620,000&-560,000\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26Continued%26Discontinued%26Differential%5C%5CSales%261%2C200%2C000%260%26-1%2C200%2C000%5C%5CVariable%26-640%2C000%260%26640%2C000%5C%5CAllocate%20cost%26-620%2C000%26-620%2C000%260%5C%5CResult%26-60%2C000%26-620%2C000%26-560%2C000%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
After posting the values, we calculate the differential income.
In this case it will be a loss for 560,000
The correct answer would be B. This is because you are spending more money aka $12,000 which would result in you having less money than if you bought one for $8,000!
Answer:
Hersey's bond = $1125.513
Mars bond = $1172.259
Explanation:
Hersey bond;
Period(t) = 10years = 40(quartely)
Coupon (C) = $30
Rate (r) = 0.1 = 0.025(quarterly)
Pay at maturity(p) = $1000
Using the both present value (PV) and compound interest formula ;
PV =[ C × (1 - (1+r)^-t) ÷ r] + [p ÷ (1 + r)^t]
PV = [30×(1-(1.025)^-40)÷0.025] + [1000÷(1.025)^40]
PV =( 753.083251562) + (372.4306236)
PV = $1125.513
Mars bond;
Period(t) = 20years = 80(quartely)
Coupon (C) = $30
Rate (r) = 0.1 = 0.025(quarterly)
Pay at maturity(p) = $1000
PV =[ C × (1 - (1+r)^-t) ÷ r] + [p ÷ (1 + r)^t]
PV = [30×(1-(1.025)^-80)÷0.025] + [1000÷(1.025)^80]
PV =(1033.55451663) + (138.704569467)
PV = $1172.259
Answer:
The extent to which a country has developed may be assessed by considering a range of narrow and broad indicators, including per capita income, life expectancy, education, and the extent of poverty.
Explanation:
thats
indicators of development
Answer:
Question 1 - A parcel of vacant land located at the intersection of two streets used heavily by commuters
The parcel of vacant land could be used for building a house for domestic purposes: to be inhabited by a family or any other group of people, or it could also be used for building a commercial property (for example, a convenience shop).
Because the parcel is located at an intersection where there are many commuters, the market will likely determine that a commercial property would be more profitable, since many commuters means many potential customers.
A house, on the other hand, could not be as profitable, because people tend to dislike living in places where there are many people around.
