Answer:
c. This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
In research, the term plagiarism refers to the fact of taking someone else's ideas or concepts and use them as if they were one's own. In other words, when writing a paper, we use someone else's work and we don't quote the original authors and it seems as if the words were ours.
In this example, we can see that the text shown <u>has a paragraph and at the end of each one it has the reference (author and year) indicating the person who actually said that before.</u> Therefore, this student is not taking someone else's work and passing it as his/her own and thus, this is not plagiarism
Answer:
a random & coincidental occurrence
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Oleg's predictive accuracy can be attributed as being a random & coincidental occurrence. This is mainly due to the fact that making this prediction correctly 7 times in a row has extremely low odds of happening and those odds keep getting worse the more times he tosses the coin.
Answer:
D. Southern states rewrote their laws to agree with the 14th Amendment and give blacks more rights. Congress seemed fully in control, but one thing stood in the way: President Johnson.
hope its correct
Carl Rogers believed<span> that for a </span>person<span> to achieve self-actualization they </span>must<span> be in a state of congruence. ... </span>Rogers<span> describes an </span>individual<span> who is actualizing as a </span>fully functioning person<span>. The main determinant of whether we will become self-actualized is childhood experience.
</span>
Answer:
A: it determined that the only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce
Explanation:
