1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andre45 [30]
3 years ago
9

Read this excerpt from The Land, Part 2. Now, I don't know what possessed me in that moment to say the next thing I did. Maybe I

was feeling guilty that because I was my daddy's son, I could ride Ghost Wind. Maybe it was that, but it wasn't out of fear I said what I said. I no longer was afraid of Mitchell. What type of conflict is occurring in this excerpt? A. character vs. nature B. character vs. self C. character vs. character D. character vs. society
English
2 answers:
siniylev [52]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:B. Character vs. self.

Explanation:

Arturiano [62]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. Character vs. self.

Explanation:

In the story "The Land" part 2 by Mildred D. Taylor, we see the character of Paul riding Ghost Wind. Paul is a mixed race of a white father and a black mother, but whose father made sure that he enjoys the same rights as that of his white brothers. Set in  the post slavery era, the story revolves around the lives of Paul and his best friend Mitchell, who is the son of a worker at Paul's father's farm.

The given excerpt is from when Paul decided to let Mitchell ride his horse Ghost Wind, even though he was not supposed to ride it, considering he was the son of a worker. The decision of Paul in allowing his best friend to ride the horse is against their very upbringing, for workers have inferior rights. Mitchell, being the son of a worker, is supposed to be lower than Paul, his master's son. But foregoing all these, Paul decides to let him enjoy. The particular excerpt is a conflict of interest between Paul's character and his own self. He even states that he "<em>don't know what possessed me in that moment to say the next thing I did"</em>. This shows the conflict he has within himself.

You might be interested in
Why does Neiterkob’s daughter most likely tell the myth
kotegsom [21]
Post more to your question of give the book title so we can better help you next time (:
6 0
3 years ago
Although the sun was warm, I shivered with cold. is it. independent or dependent
Fudgin [204]
Independent i believe because a dependent clause is <span>A </span>dependent clause<span> is a group of words with a subject and a verb. It does not express a complete thought so it is not a sentence and can't stand alone. These </span>clauses<span> include adverb </span>clauses<span>, adjective </span>clauses<span> and noun </span>clauses. a independent clause is <span>An independent clause is a group of words that can stand alone as a sentence. It has both a subject and a verb and forms a complete thought. Independent clauses make clear communication possible, whether we're writing or speaking.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read this passage from chapter 5 of The Prince.
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

1: The first sentence lists specific conditions followed by what might eventually happen.

3: The second sentence starts with the expression “for this reason.”

4: The second sentence lists potential consequences of the situation described.

Explanation:

"The Prince" (1532) is a political treatise by Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) who was an  Italian diplomat, politician, historian, and political philosopher.

The Chapter 5 of the book is "Conquered Free States, with their own laws and orders"

Option 1 might or might not be a cause-and-effect structure. It might not necessarily be cause-and-effect structure. Two events happening one after and other does not show that the first one is the cause and the second one effect. But, it is also true that in cause-and-effect structure one event (result) happens followed by another event.

Option 3 is correct because it clearly shows a cause-and-effect structure <u>(for this reason).</u>

Option 4 is correct because the events stated in the second sentence are the consequences (effect/result) of the situations described in the first sentence.

Option 2 is not cause-and-effect structure. "On the one hand" and "on the other hand" is used to describe two parallel and contrasting ideas. Hence, it is a contrasting structure.

Option 5 is not a cause-and-effect structure because the phrase <em>"citizen of the conquered city"</em> in no way shows the cause and effect of any situation

7 0
4 years ago
When was the last time you did any sport? what happened?​
deff fn [24]

Answer:

The last time i did a sport was 2 springs ago. I was at my soccer tournament and we played the same team 3 times. The last game we played the soccer ball hit off of me into our goal. We ended up loosing anyway.

(American soccer)

5 0
3 years ago
According to the video and your own common sense, what happens if you practice reading challenging texts? [choose all that apply
prisoha [69]

Answer:

All of them would apply

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 13 please <br> URGENT
    15·2 answers
  • Which word contains a word root that means “believe”?
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Describe the central internal conflict each protagonist seems to experience. What emotion, personality trait, or idea does ea
    12·1 answer
  • A foil is a character who contrasts with another character. How does the character eurylochus serve as a foil to Odysseus in boo
    12·1 answer
  • What two important things did Oliver Chase invent
    5·2 answers
  • Is milk a pure substance or a mixture?? Explain how you know
    14·2 answers
  • What values are revealed by Native American stories about the origin of the earth and its creatures?
    12·1 answer
  • In your opinion, does the "Hunger Games" reflect the real world?
    6·2 answers
  • A essay on Kathrine johnson
    12·1 answer
  • Is ammonia an acid or a base?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!