Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Few books were available in the middle ages because there was no such thing as printing back then and all books were handwritten, causing them to cost more because of the amount of labor being put forth to create them. Writing books by hand doesn't really sound like a fun job lol so there were limited amounts of books made because there were so few people writing them
Answer:
Gurjara-Pratihara, Rashtrakuta and Pala dynasties
Explanation:
There are three parties involved and take part in the tripartite struggle, they are as follows:
1).Gurjara-Pratihara
2).Rashtrakuta
3)Pala dynasties
This parties were responsible for fighting for dominance of Kannaul.
The Tripartite Struggle which was dated back to the ninth century was mainly for struggle to possesse and have Dominion over the northern India.
B is it if I’m not mistaken
Country. Location is a key difference between the two wars. The American Revolution took place in a colony an ocean away from its ruling monarchy in Britain. The French Revolution took place within France itself, an action that directly threatened the French monarchy.