Answer:
41.13 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
ITSSSS RIGHTTTTTTTTT
17/33 in lowest terms<span>
17/33 is in lowest terms. It cant be divided any farther.
</span><span />
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
10 / (2/5)...when dividing with fractions, flip what u r dividing by, then multiply
10 * 5/2 = 50/2 = 25...so there are 25 of them
The expression is 2 x3 + 7 =13
