Answer:
By submitting to punishment, the civil disobedient hopes to set a moral example that will provoke the majority or the government into effecting meaningful political, social, or economic change. Under the imperative of setting a moral example, leaders of civil disobedience insist that the illegal actions be nonviolent.
Explanation:
No it is not fair because muslim are making different kind of bad rule for non muslim
One way that politics/society is different today as in 1939 is that in 1939 voting wasnt the same for some people, but today everyone has rights to vote. One way that is the same is that males have been president since 1939- today.
The Port Huron Statement was to the Students for a Democratic Society what the Sharon Statement was to the Young Americans for Freedom.
<h3>What was the Young Americans for Freedom?</h3>
This refers to the social group which had the aim of influencing public policy and their values are consistent with the Sharon Statement.
Hence, we can note that just as the Port Huron Statement was to the Students for a Democratic Society what the Sharon Statement was to the Young Americans for Freedom because it talked about political freedom goes hand in hand with economic freedom.
Read more about social groups here:
brainly.com/question/782530
A personal responsibility is option D - taking care of yourself and your family.
Obeying laws, paying taxes, and understanding the values in the U.S. Constitution are all civic responsibilities. They are examples of acts and perspectives of civilly responsible citizens.
I hope this helps!
