Plz help me with this question from the nichomachean ethics or 2 question

1 answer:

4 0

You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon

You might be interested in

You have an assignment in your history class to read an article and write an essay that evaluates the quality of the historical

d1i1m1o1n [39]

The step of the reading process in the prompt that is MOST directly asking you to complete is:

<u>D.)responding, because you need to think about and question the information in the article and come to your own conclusion about it</u>

<u />

According to the given question, a person is required to read an article, write an essay, and support the essay with examples from the article.

As a result, the step of reading that needs to be completed is responding. This is because, the reader is required to refer to an article and use information from it to make personal conclusions.