Answer:
Natalia's work is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
Natalia divided a decimal number by an entire number. Since division is a operation derived from multiplication, the best approach to check if work was good is multiplying the given result by denomination, that is:
1) 
Given.
2) 
Definition of addition.
3) 
Distributive property.
4) 
Definitions of multiplication and decimal number.
5) ![x = 72 +[2\cdot (10)^{-1}]\cdot 12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%5B2%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5Ccdot%2012)
Definition of division/Associative property.
6) ![x = 72 + [2\cdot 12]\cdot (10)^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%20%5B2%5Ccdot%2012%5D%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D)
Associative property.
7) 
Definition of multiplication.
8) 
Definition of divsion.
9) 
Defintion of decimal number.
10) 
Definition of addition/Result
Natalia's work is wrong.
Answer:
The hole is at (5,7)
Step-by-step explanation:
x^2 − 3x − 10
-------------------
x−5
Factor the numerator
(x-5)(x+2)
-------------------
x−5
There is a hole at x=5 since it will cancel in the numerator and the denominator
f(x) = x+2 and letting x = 5
f(5) = 5+2
The hole is at (5,7)
I assume you meant 
.
Reflecting across the x-axis would give 
.
Reflecting across the y-axis would give 
.
Answer:
x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
(11-3)+3x+1 = 5x+3
8+3x+1 = 5x+3
9+3x= 5x+3
6=2x
x=3
