Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
Answer:
B. $280,000
Explanation:
The capital assets are those assets which are used for the personal purpose, not for the business purpose. The examples of capital assets include personal property, stocks, bonds, clothing, dwelling, etc.
It excludes that property which is used for trade or business purpose like - limousine.
In the given situation, the capital asset would be $280,000 as it owns for personal residence and furnishings.
That is not a question it is a statement. However yes, businesses tend to increase the price of an activity the more customers react positively to the activity.
