<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
Answer:
at equilibrium point
Explanation:
equilibrium when price is reasonable to both sellers and buyers. They are willing to buy and sell at optimal quantity, so that firm can maximize revenue
The answer is marginal costs in both places are the same. This
is because the farmers in both places are profit-maximizers, the value in each flat
is equal to MC or Marginal Cost and subsequently the market of corn is competitive,
the price of corn in both places is the same. Also, marginal costs are higher
in East Icicle than in Corncrib can also be a possible answer. For any given outflow
per acre Corncrib’s corn yield are far better than in East Icicle, at any level
of output, the marginal cost per acre in East Icicle must be higher in
Corncrib, which suggests that in equilibrium the output level of corn in East
Icicle is less than the output level of corn in Corncrib.
T's impossible to determine whether lowering costs or increasing revenue is more important across the board for all companies. There are too many factors that can influence the answer for a given company, in a given market or in a given economy. A specific marketing focus may be the key to financial stability and steadily increasing profits.<span>
</span>
Answer:
2 tons of millet for New Zealand and 3 tons of millet for Brazil.
Explanation:
New Zealand and brazil both can produce corns and millet. The opportunity cost for Brazil is more than the New Zealand. Both the countries should go towards the production of the crop in which they have comparative advantage. New Zealand has comparative advantage in producing millet and Brazil has comparative advantage in producing corn.
