Given that a small hair styling salon had revenues of
$150,000 in a given year. The owner spent $10,000 on utilities, $60,000 on
supplies, and $50,000 on equipment, including maintenance. The total profit of
the salon should 150,000 –( 10,000 +
60,000 + 50,000) = $30,000. The owner could have earned more if he work at
another salon.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The company cost of capital is
Cost of equity = (D1 ÷ share price)+ Dividend growth rate
= ($1 ÷ $30) + 0.04
= 0.033 +0.04
= 0.0733 or 7.33%
Now
b. Cost of new equity is
= (D1 ÷ share price × (1 - flotation cost)) + Dividend growth rate
= [$1 ÷ $30 × (1 - 0.1)] + 0.04
= ($1 ÷ $30 × 0.9) + 0.04
= 1 ÷ 27 + 0.04
= 0.037 + 0.04
= 0.07704 or 7.71%
The answer is 1 level apart because 4-5=1 and 5 is 1 more up than 4
Answer:
B) Tom's statements provide grounds to set the contract aside.
Explanation:
When we are talking about setting a contract aside, it means that the contract is voidable. A voidable contract is valid until one of the parts decides to void it. In this case, if Victoria decides to purchase Tom's car and later discovers that he lied about the price, she can void the contract and return the car to get her money back.
What Tom is doing is basically lying about the material facts of the product that they are bargaining and it represents a valid reason for voiding the contract.
Answer:
The correct option which would not be an expected response from decrease in price level is A) with fall in prices, Fargo concrete company has decided to let go workers who have fixed price contracts.
Explanation:
All the options except A are expected response from the fall in price and helps in explaining why the aggregate demand curve shifted ( towards the right ) . In the option B , Tyler decided to remodel his kitchen because of fall in prices, as now he is able to spend more on consumption and investment activities. Same thing is happening in option C and D as the company's here are increasing their investment spending due to the decreased prices.
But the option A , isn't something that was expected as company's don't usually fire their workers just because they have fixed price wage contract and prices have fallen, company is trying to take advantage of fallen prices by reducing the fixed wage workers and hiring new workers on a cheap wage , which help in reducing the company's cost.