Answer:
Substitute for leadership
Explanation:
The substitute for leadership theory takes the intriguing view that in many organizations, if characteristics of subordinates (team members), the nature of the tasks that they perform, and the guidance and incentives provided by the organization are aligned, then formal leadership tends to be unproductive or counterproductive.
Answer:
Risk is inevitable in everything we do. ... There may be some unlikely but high impact risks, for example, the risk that the solution could cause the destruction of the organisation (see the case studies below). The good Project Manager will constantly assess the risks and take action as needed.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": The maximum level of production of goods and services for a society.
Explanation:
Production efficiency or productive efficiency is the point in which an economy cannot increase output in a good or service without lowering the production level of another product. An economy that operates along its production possibility frontier (<em>PPF</em>)<em> </em>has maximized its production efficiency. In other words, that economy is working at its maximum possible level.
Answer:
If a coworker just brought you a union leaflet urging employees to sign an authorization card, the questions needed to ask him will be:
1. How the authorization card work.
2. What does it necessarily mean if one signs the authorization card
3. The next steps after signing the authorization card and what to expect as the end result.
4. If signing the card automatically makes one to become a member of the union.
Answer:
Vanessa’s <u>task-oriented</u> leadership behavior is likely to be <u>ineffective</u> because <u>l</u><u>ow position power</u> <u>neutralizes</u> this leadership behavior.
Explanation:
Vanessa is a newcomer to a company, with less time and acting experience than her staff, so her leadership behavior will be offset by her low position power. This occurs when an employee's hierarchical position does not allow certain actions, so Vanessa's actions would be neutralized and ineffective, having no impact on decision making.
