Answer:
raises a federal question; concurrent
Explanation:
A plaintiff is a party or an individual who files a case against another party in the court of law.
The prevents the Government or the Congress to make any law that regulates the establishment of any religion or it prevents the free exercise of any religion or abridge the freedom of press or of speech and he right of people for peaceful assembly.
Concurrent jurisdiction exits where more than one court is involved and where the hearing is done in two or more courts together and simultaneously over the specific case.
In the context, a person files a case against a campaign-financing law of North Carolina stating that the law violates the plaintiffs First Amendment freedom of speech rights.
Thus his lawsuit raises a federal question and the case falls under a concurrent jurisdiction where more than one court will have jurisdiction over the case.
The president resolved the sudden loss by passing the Revenue Act of 1861, which said that all citizens would tax to support the war.
The answer to this question is option b.
<h3>The Revenue Act of 1861</h3>
The revenue act was signed by president Lincoln in order to have the nation or the union take care of civil war expenses.
A tax of 3 percent was imposed on the citizens that had income that was more than 800 dollars.
Also imports were also taxed in the country in order to take care of the expenses.
Read more on the the Revenue Act of 1861 here:
brainly.com/question/2430507
Answer:
The Brown case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education was a US Supreme Court decision that declared the separation between black and white students in public schools unconstitutional. While this was definitely the case in Brown, the NAACP (National Association for the Progress of the Black Population), founded on February 12, 1909, had been campaigning against racial segregation in the United States for nearly twenty years.
The Brown v. Board of Education may be related to the paragraph shown in the above question, which reports on passenger separation to the bus or compartment designated for the race to which it belongs, because both cases report on the separation of individuals into groups.
Answer: Reflect - In your own words, explain the meaning and purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment. You should use phrases from the amendment to complement your explanation, but not replace it.
Analyze – Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Evaluate - Do policies that assist a specific group of people fulfill or violate the Fourteenth Amendment? Explain the reasons for your response.
Reflect/Research – Is your opinion on question three consistent or in conflict with your opinion on other cases or laws? Give an example from your study in this course. (You might consider your opinion from Case Study Three. It asked whether juveniles accused of serious crimes should be treated as adults.)
Explanation:
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Office of Personnel Management - This office is responsible for the management of the civil service and is also responsible for employing new employees and managing their pensions and other retirement benefits.
The also ensure that insurance are provided to the government workers.
Merit System Protection Board - This ensures that there's an efrwctice and efficient workforce. It also ensures that excellent services are given to the citizens by the workers.
Office of the Government Ethics: It is charged with the responsibility of overseeing and guiding the government employees and ensuring that ethic laws are been maintained. It ensures that conflict of interest among employees are prevented.
These agencies are important because they ensure that the aims of the government are met through the provision of necessary materials to ensure improvement in workers productivity and conditions and also monitoring of employees to ensure that the goals of the government are met.