<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
Answer:
Through nonviolent protest the civil right movement of the 1950 and 60s broke the pattern of public facilities being segregated by race in the south and achieved the most important breakthrough in equal rights legislation for African Americans since the reconstruction period 1865-77
Explanation:
By helping each other get through and meet each other helped one another to pass the cold war
I think it is A. state department
At the time, more than 750,000 people were displaced and this caused a big refugee crisis due to the fact that the Palestinians were expelled from their homes and a lot of villages were left vacant.
