1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VashaNatasha [74]
3 years ago
14

Why would someone continue to fight in a battle after the war was basically over

History
1 answer:
Zina [86]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It really depends.

Explanation:

There are many reasons someone would fight after a war was over. Even after world war one, many fought for a monarchist Germany, due to their national pride. Or maybe it was because they believed in a government that was different to the one they were assigned after they lost a war. After WW2, many soviets continued to fight Germans and kill them, due to their part in the war, and how many lives the Germans had claimed. It really depends on what happened during the war, what the outcome was, and more.

You might be interested in
Why did great Britain become so wealthy in the 18th century
VLD [36.1K]
They started extending business to other parts of the globe, trading and a industrial revolution
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did john winthrop change fhe government of massachusetts?
denpristay [2]
Winthrop, John, 1588–1649, governor of the Massachusetts Bay colony, b. Edwardstone, near Groton, Suffolk, England. Of a landowning family, he studied at Trinity College, Cambridge, came into a family fortune, and became a government administrator with strong Puritan leanings.
8 0
3 years ago
Why did many Englishmen feel cheated by the Reform Act of 1832?
pychu [463]

The act gave too few additional men the right to vote since the right to vote was based on owning property.

5 0
3 years ago
Given the world political situation in 1947, who do you think are the "armed minorities" and "outside pressures" who are trying
Mila [183]

Answer: Directly, The National Liberation Front, or the EAM/ELAS (A Communist Insurgency in Greece).

Indirectly, Communists in general.

Explanation:

The world in 1947 was a very different one from the world in 1945 for whereas in the former the West and ghe Soviet Union had been triumphant Allies who vanquished the Nazis in the Second World War, in the latter they were rivals, competing to impose their own view of Political theory on the world.

The British had been responsible for liberating Greece in the Second World War which is why it had not fallen into the hands of the Soviets and Turkey had maintained neutrality, only joining the War in the last months and never actually fighting so they didn't fall into the hands of the Soviets either.

Britain supplied Aid to both countries to keep them from falling into Soviet Communism but in 1947 could do no more because the British Economy had barely survived the war.

They informed the USA and after some negotiations with Congress, President Truman uttered the very popular, Truman Doctrine.

In his speech he said, "It must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures."

The armed minority he was directly referring to were the National Liberation Front, or the EAM/ELAS which was waging an insurgency in Greece at the time but in general, he wanted the United States to take a stand against all communists groups that would attempt to take over nations by force and against the Soviet Union that would attempt to place pressure on countries to join their side.

8 0
4 years ago
To what degree are the modern democratic ideals of voting, open debate, and trial by jury based upon the ideas of the ancient gr
eduard
Modern democratic ideals owe a great deal to the vote based system of antiquated Athens. This early endeavor at a reasonable and equivalent government keep running by the citizenry was extraordinary, and it filled in as a model for all the majority rule governments that came after it. Abused by the oligarchical administer of a modest bunch of blue-bloods, the old Athenians looked for a legislature where all natives would decide how the state was run. Mistreated by the domineering principle of a remote ruler, the recently proclaimed Americans looked for a similar cure, yet in a somewhat unique frame. The U.S. Congress plays the part that the Assembly and Council of 500 did in old Athens, proposing and voting on enactment correspondingly, however it is comprised of a considerably littler assemblage of chose agents than the Assembly. Moreover, while U.S. courts have significantly littler juries, a substantially more directed process, and considerably more effective judges, the fundamental thought of a reasonable trial by jury is the same as Ancient Greece.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Meiji Restoration address feudalism?
    12·2 answers
  • How did doves and hawks differ?
    11·2 answers
  • How did howe's victory in philadelphia lead to Burgoyne's defeat at Saratoga
    12·1 answer
  • The Office of Management and Budget __________.
    11·2 answers
  • Why was the scandal that led to President Nixon's resignation called "Watergate"?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the Nicaraguan Revolution re-define the parameters of art? What were some of the innovations that supported the renewed
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the Monroe Doctrine of such importance to the United States? It announced that the United States was ready to enter into
    15·1 answer
  • 20 points & brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • Pls help with this thank you
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!