1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
3 years ago
13

Why was Missouri joining the union controversial? Missouri wanted to be a free state, so the South did not want to admit it to t

he union. Missouri would upset the balance between the equal number of slave states and free states. Missouri would be too much of a drain on the national economy, so both the North and South opposed statehood. Missouri would cause there to be twice as many slave states as free states, so free states opposed statehood.
History
2 answers:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

podryga [215]3 years ago
7 0
The correct option is this: Missouri would upset the balance between the equal number of slave trades and free states.
In 1820, when Missouri was about to be admitted into the union, the issue of slavery came up again, because there had been tension between the north and the south concerning the issue of slavery. At that time the number of states who participate in slavery and those who did not were equal. But when Missouri applied to the union as a slave state, there was controversy because its admission will upset the balance of free and slave states.<span />
You might be interested in
What advantages did britain have over germany in the battle of britain?
dsp73
In the summer and fall of 1940, German and British air forces clashed in the skies over the United Kingdom, locked in the largest sustained bombing campaign to that date. A significant turning point of World War II, the Battle of Britain ended when Germany’s Luftwaffe failed to gain air superiority over the Royal Air Force despite months of targeting Britain’s air bases, military posts and, ultimately, its civilian population. Britain’s decisive victory saved the country from a ground invasion and possible occupation by German forces while proving that air power alone could be used to win a major battle.<span>On June 17, 1940, the defeated French signed an armistice and quit </span>World War II<span>. Britain now stood alone against the power of Germany’s military forces, which had conquered most of Western Europe in less than two months. But Prime Minister Winston Churchill rallied his stubborn people and outmaneuvered those politicians who wanted to negotiate with </span>Adolf Hitler. But Britain’s success in continuing the war would very much depend on the RAF Fighter Command’s ability to thwart the Luftwaffe’s efforts to gain air superiority. This then would be the first all-air battle in history.In fact, Britain’s situation was more favorable than most of the world recognized at the time. Britain possessed an effective air defense system, first-rate fighter pilots, and a great military leader in Air Marshal Hugh Dowding. On the other hand, the Germans had major problems: they had no navy left after the costly conquest of Norway, their army was unprepared for any form of amphibious operations, and the Luftwaffe had suffered heavy losses in the west (the first two factors made a seaborne attack on the British Isles impossible from the first).

Even more serious, the Germans had poor intelligence and little idea of British vulnerabilities. They wasted most of July in waiting for a British surrender and attacked only in August. Although air strikes did substantial damage to radar sites, on August 13–15 the Luftwaffe soon abandoned that avenue and turned to attacks on RAF air bases. A battle of attrition ensued in which both sides suffered heavy losses (an average loss of 21 percent of the RAF’s fighter pilots and 16 percent of the Luftwaffe’s fighter pilots each month during July, August, and September).

For a time the advantage seemed to swing slightly in favor of the Germans, but a combination of bad intelligence and British attacks on Berlin led the Luftwaffe to change its operational approach to massive attacks on London. The first attack on London on September 7 was quite successful; the second, on September 15, failed not only with heavy losses, but also with a collapse of <span>morale among German bomber crews when British fighters appeared in large numbers and shot down many of the Germans. As a result, Hitler permanently postponed a landing on the British Isles and suspended the Battle of Britain.</span>

6 0
3 years ago
How did the ability to produce newspapers inexpensively change their content? (explain ""yellow journalism"" as part of your ans
Romashka [77]

Answer:

Techological improvements allowed for mass printing of newspapers and books in the 19th and 20th centuries. This has had an economic, commercial and social impact. It was possible to reach thousands or even millions of people with a single edition; it was possible now to reach a massive audience who did not have higher education, but wanted to read news and have some form of entertainment. People have always wanted to know about  shocking events, disasters, tragedies, violent crimes and the juicy details of the romantic life of those famous and powerful. There is an old phrase of American journalism: "Dog bites man, that´s not news. Man bites dog, that´s news." So , newspapers for a massive audience were set up and exploited stories about violence, crime and sex. That´s the advent of "yellow journalism" in the modern world. Besides, having a high number of readers or subscribers assured profits for newspaper owners, because the larger the audience, the larger the advertising revenues. This logic continues to be true today.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What was Abraham Lincoln's message in the Gettysburg address?
likoan [24]
D. Both democracy and the United States would endure<span>.</span> is the answer.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Candomblé preserves African ancestor worship through?
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

C. the correlation of saints to ancestors or gods

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Once Congress declares war and the President assumes the role of Commander-in-Chief who decides how the war ends?​
Inessa [10]

Answer:

Both? here let me explain...

Explanation:

If you want to get technical, once the President assumes the Role of Commander in Chief of the United States Military he has control over all military action while congress; per the original intent of the constitution, has control over starting war and ending it. If you really had to choose one or the other the Commander in Chief has in most occurrences decided how war ends. I really hope this helped, if not my apologies and if you need any more elaboration please let me know down in the comments and I will do my best.

 

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to Hall’s drawing, which of the following words might describe the experience of fighting on Leyte Island?
    5·1 answer
  • Use an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other sources to research the following Reconstruction scandals: The Tweed Ring in New Yor
    5·2 answers
  • one of the best known black women in the struggle for civil rights was Ida B Wells. Which statement best describes one of her co
    13·1 answer
  • What were some of the hardships that frontier farmers faced in the mid to late 1800s?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the Edwards Plateau. What type of geography is common in this section of Texas? What type of industry is
    14·1 answer
  • The "Flapper" or 'New woman' of the 20s
    9·1 answer
  • "Many good deeds today will serve me well in my next reincarnation." A person practicing what religion would most likely speak t
    10·1 answer
  • Which two factors contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire? A:The Yellow Turbans led a rebellion against the emperor, which l
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Inca honor their gods?
    9·1 answer
  • Why must the government be formed this way?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!