It’s defined by historical context igggggg
I think it would be:
And we knew the disaster, which would come to this Nation, and to all peace-loving nations, to all civilization, if they had found it first.andWe have used it in order to shorten the agony of war,
Read more on Brainly -
brainly.com/sf/question/7510300
A historian would first look at the reliability of a source - when it was published and what was happening at the time (context), who wrote it and their qualifications, any bias the author may hold, whether author sources corroborate the source, whether the author has used references, whether the source provides evidence, who the source is representative of and whether the source provides a balanced perspective
Answer:
A. They believed that the church had moved away from its core teachings and become corrupt.
Explanation:
There you go
For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>
The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
