whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states
The issue in the case was whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to jury trial in state prosecutions where sentences as long as two years may be imposed. In its ruling, the Supreme Court found that the right to a jury trial in criminal cases is within the 14th Amendment and so is applicable to the states
Answer:
C) The Muslims had a great impact on Spanish culture
Explanation:
We can narrow down these answers based on the information provided. The answers suggest three different areas in which the Muslims influenced the Spanish; language, economy, and culture. The picture and the description are referencing a cathedral. This is a cultural aspect of a country. A cathedral does not relate to how a countries language or economy was influenced, but instead it's culture.
Answer:
The Know-Nothing Party
Explanation:
The American Party favored by the <u>nativist</u>s was also called by people as "The Know-Nothing Party." It started as a <em>secret society </em>in the <em>1850s</em> and propelled as<u> a movement against the Catholics (especially in the North) and immigration.</u>
People who belong to the group (especially the Protestants) were fearful that the Catholic priests would take control of the voters. So, when members were asked about their party's information (since little was known about them), they would reply "I Know Nothing."
This party didn't last that long because the leaders were deemed incapable and they also had varying opinions about issues on slavery.
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
It means that the emperor is not wearing any clothes?
