<span>Analyze the main idea.
Ask questions of the text.
Predict what will come next. theese are them
</span>
Answer:
fear
Explanation:
The narrator of the text shown above, presents terrible and frightening visions in relation to the word "call-up", which instantly makes the narrator think about the terrors that happen in the concentration camps and fears that her father will end up in this place of suffering. , terror and death.
This shows us that the narrator is afraid and that is the mood she wants to pass on to the reader.
Answer:
The similarity between these two texts is that both highlight the admiration for someone who is already dead. The difference is that "The Gettysburg Address" admires soldiers who died in the war, while "O Captain, My Captain" refers to admiration for the ship's captain, who represents Lincoln.
Explanation:
Both texts present an emotional language, where they admire and emphasize the importance of people who died in favor of a cause.
In "The Gettysburg Address" we can see a prose text, where the dead in the civil war are highlighted as heroes and important in this very inhospitable and dangerous environment. In "The Captain, My Captain" the language is even more emotional and shows the admiration of a captain who died while trying to guide his vessel on a dangerous voyage.
Answer:
No, it is not possible to sympathize with Raju or be content with the ending of the story for it presents no change of heart in the criminal even after he was convicted and jailed for some months.
Explanation:
R. K. Narayan's short story "Trail of the Green Blazer" revolves around the story of a pickpocket named Raju and his intention to correct his wrong ways. But in his attempt to make things right, (even if it's just to return a balloon for the motherless child), he ended up being caught and convicted, leading to his imprisonment for 18 months.
Considering the ending of the story,<u> it is not fair to say that it is the right way for the plot to end</u>. There is always retribution for any wrongful act committed and if Raju hadn't decided to return the purse with the balloon to the Green Blazer, there is no knowing he may change his ways and stop stealing. With his act caught and him convicted and imprisoned, the event can change him for the better. But that did not even seem to change him. The story ends with him deciding that <em>"If ever I pick up something again, I shall make sure I don’t have to put it back"</em>. This shows that he's still thinking of continuing his ways and making sure that he did not return anything, not even if it involves a <em>"motherless child".</em> So, it is hard to sympathize with him for there is no change of heart even after being imprisoned.
A dependent clauses is something like ok say u got a chair with no legs it cant stand so it dedpening on the legs to make it stand