the internal validity is still manipulated by the researcher and the DV is measured.
The DV is a variable that is being measured/observed, whereas the IV is a variable that is altered to see how it impacts something else. The term "dependent" refers to the idea that the IV will have an impact on the DV.
<h3>What parallels exist between studies conducted in a lab and those conducted in the field?</h3>
Since experiments are the only way to reliably establish causality, laboratory and field experiments are comparable in that they are both helpful in determining cause and effect. Furthermore, because there is a high level of control over confounding variables, the two experiment designs have the potential to have high internal validity.
Learn more about internal validity:
brainly.com/question/15704269
#SPJ4
Answer:
I believe it's A.
Explanation:
Women, at the time, of course, could not enlist into the regular ranks of the soldiers.
Hope this helps :)
<span>Authentic leadership denotes the authenticity of leaders and their leadership.</span>
The developmental definition of authentic leadership<span> views leadership as something to be nurtured in a leader.
</span>According this definition authentic
leadership develops in people over a lifetime and can be triggered by
major life events, such as a severe illness or a new career.
This is an example of Classical Conditioning.
Answer:
Conflicts with other tribes.
Explanation:
When Settlers traded with one tribe only, the gain in prosperity that is obtained by leveraging on the local resources will only be felt by that one tribes.
The other tribes felt the deteriorating resources (since they live within the same region), but do not receive the same benefit in return as that one tribes. As a result, this will gradually build up resentment towards that one tribes or the European settlers. This what might lead to wars/conflicts.
