The Hopi (in what is now the Hopi Reservation in northeastern Arizona), according to Alice Schlegel, had as its "gender ideology ... one of female superiority, and it operated within a social actuality of sexual equality."[1] According to Diana LeBow (based on Schlegel's work), in the Hopi, "gender roles ... are egalitarian .... [and] [n]either sex is inferior."[2] LeBow concluded that Hopi women "participate fully in ... political decision-making."[3] According to Schlegel, "the Hopi no longer live as they are described here"[4] and "the attitude of female superiority is fading".[4] Schlegel said the Hopi "were and still are matrilinial"[5][a] and "the household ... was matrilocal".[5][b]
Schlegel THIS IS SO LIKE COOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL there was female superiority as that the Hopi believed in "life as the highest good ... [with] the female principle ... activated in women and in Mother Earth ... as its source"[6] and that the Hopi "were not in a state of continual war with equally matched neighbors"[7] and "had no standing army"[7] so that "the Hopi lacked the spur to masculine superiority"[7] and, within that, as that women were central to institutions of clan and household and predominated "within the economic and social systems (in contrast to male predominance within the political and ceremonial systems)",[7] the Clan Mother, for example, being empowered to overturn land distribution by men if she felt it was unfair,[6] since there was no "countervailing ... strongly centralized, male-centered political structure"
They first started exploring in Minnesota
Answer:
the answer is B. monarchy
Explanation:
Tyrant, Greek tyrannos, a cruel and oppressive ruler or, in ancient Greece, a ruler who seized power unconstitutionally or inherited such power. In the 10th and 9th centuries bce, monarchy was the usual form of government in the Greek states.
<u>hope this helps and feel free to give brainiest</u>
Answer
1. Arabs
2. failed to consider Arabs interest.
Explanation:
just did it on edge
Answer:
Lack of one ruler, lack of unity, hatred against each other and difference in religious beliefs.
Explanation:
India was a very big country also known as sub-continent before partition. There are different empires are present in different parts of Indian sub-continent not a single ruler that helps the British to rule over India. They started wars between them and when they became weak, the British capture their lands and rule over them. Lack of unity among these empires against the foreign enemies and hatred against each other on the basis of caste and religions provide chance to rule over India.