1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irakobra [83]
1 year ago
8

How was militarism uses to prevent fighting?

History
1 answer:
puteri [66]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

Strong armies and navies were needed to defend the homeland, to protect imperial and trade interests abroad and to deter threats. War was avoided where possible – but it could also be used to advance a nation's political or economic interests.

Explanation:

yw

You might be interested in
Helpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp
Lapatulllka [165]
1. I think its Homer?
2. It’s Socrates
3. Plato!
(I hope this helps!)
8 0
2 years ago
In 3 years how many Jews were deported to concentration camps?
Arada [10]

Answer: I think 3million.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were Romans were upset by the emperor’s decision to create more coins?
AnnyKZ [126]
The people needed to use more coins to buy the same amount of food as before.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think is a valid reason for a country to go to war? Read the reasons below and decide whether you think each reason
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Hey!
Hope this helps...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I do not believe there is the right reason for any country to go into war. Although if I had to pick one reason that a country might go into a war, or a reason that could be justifiable for going into war. My decision would be going into war to protect an ally from an invasion.
This is not because of the thought of war, this is because if a country lose his allies, it would be defenseless when war is thrust of the pawn that country who needed that Ally.

So i would say the answer is: B.) to protect an Ally from an invasion.
8 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the Republic of Texas and the newly annexed state of Texas restrict the lives of free blacks?
arsen [322]

Republic of Texas and newly annexed state of Texas both restricted the lives of the free blacks by making a system of harsh punishment to the blacks.

Explanation:

Slaves were not belong to the Texas state. They came from the countries of European continent to the southern and eastern part of North America i.e in Texas. Slavery was not a legal process. According to the census of United States majority population of Texas was slaves.

Free blacks did not have much contribution in Texas. Though they have fought in several war in favor of Texas. Texas was under Mexican government's jurisdiction. Mexican government never allowed the slave system. They wanted to set them free from slavery system. They tried to abolish this system and be in side of blacks.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What functions does the emperor fulfill
    14·1 answer
  • Which methods did Stalin use to gain power? Check all that apply.
    12·2 answers
  • Why was Susan B. Anthony put on trial?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of Christmas? what is it for and who was there? (3-4 sentences detailed)
    15·1 answer
  • Motivations for European Colonization
    13·2 answers
  • What bounds North America to the north?
    6·1 answer
  • How does odysseus maintain power over ithaca
    7·1 answer
  • Which reform measure could voters use to approve an amendment to their state constitution?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the Ottoman Empire's role in the Middle
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a difference between the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and john locke?​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!