A politician who tend to use an event like a mass shooting to mourn the victims and celebrate their lives while avoiding advancing any changes to gun laws is using the kind of epideictic rhetoric.
So here one of the three branches or species of rhetoric are said to have been described in Aristotle's Rhetoric. Thus, in order to be used to praise or blame during ceremonies, this is called epideictic oratory.
However, here the purpose of the epideictic rhetoric, which is said to focus on the present, is used in order to emphasize and characterize what makes a person or thing outstanding. So, here an example of a politician is given.
Hence, epideictic rhetoric is said to be demonstrated by what happens after a person has passed away.
To learn more about Aristotle here:
brainly.com/question/5399979
#SPJ4
A) to amuse, because the passage contain many funny jokes and asides.
Explanation:
While any SAT article may have a funny interpretation or an aside it is unlikely that a possible interpretation of only the funny or amusing elements just for the sake of being amusing would be required to be talked about on the text.
If<u> the humor is to be interpreted it has to be along with the theme that the passage conveys that it should work and not entirely on its own as being amusing for amusement's sake.</u>
Answer:
It might have been China, I believe
Explanation:
The correct answer is insatiable. Insatiable is being
defined as a desire of which a person seems to have no possibility of satisfying
one’s self. It is because people tend to desire more goods in which they think
would be more better than the previous one that they are referred or called to
be insatiable.
