"Professor Hammond studies ethical behavior and designs a study to examine the amount of cheating at her school. At the beginnin
g of class each day, she passes around a chart showing the dates of the class meetings, with boxes for students to initial if they were present. She photocopies the sheet after each class so she can find if any students initial for days they were absent. She waits for interesting results before writing a proposal for the institutional review board (IRB). Which ethical standard does waiting to propose the study violate
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
<u>There is no correlation between the type of car owned and the risk of being stolen</u>. Correlation is a term reserved for describing linear associations between quantitative variables. There is an association, not a correlation.
Explanation:
The type of car owned is a categorical variable not a quantitative variable.
<h3>Answer: Both major political parties of the U.S.—the Democratic Party and the Republican Party—officially nominate their candidate for President at their respective national conventions.</h3><h3></h3>
I believe the answer is: increasing generalizability
Generalizability refers to the extend that a conclusion of a research could be applicable to different people. As generalizability goes higher, The reliability of the measurement would be increased. and it could easily be replicable even if the test subjects are drastically altered.