1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alecsey [184]
3 years ago
8

An argument on man vs nature.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Anon25 [30]3 years ago
5 0
<span>nature can survive with out man, man cannot survive with out nature. nature nurtures and yes, destroys, but it destroys us in self defense. if there were more of us, we would be so over populated that the earth would not be able to feed us. as man destroys nature he destroys himself.</span>
Katen [24]3 years ago
4 0
Man are weak because there's not enough of them too deffeat nature. nature is more powerful because they are stronger just think about the strongest animal
You might be interested in
. Which of the following statements best describes literacy rates in North Africa? A. Literacy rates are decreasing in the regio
ycow [4]

The answer is  B. Literacy rates are increasing in the region, and the gap between men and women is decreasing. Annual regional-level literacy estimates based on national data and the Unesco  Institute  for Statistics projections from 1990 to 2016  tell us that Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, Southern Asia, and Northern Africa and Western Asia have made the greatest progress in improving adult literacy over the past 26 years .

According to the Fact Sheet No. 45 dated  September 2017 of the Unesco  Institute  for Statistics, Northern Africa and Western Asia literacy rate went from 64% to 81. The youth literacy rate increased in Northern Africa and Western Asia from 80% to 90% and sub-Saharan Africa  from 65% to 75%. Female literacy rates-lower than male literacy rates at the start of the period - generally grew faster than male literacy rates between 1990 and 2016.Thus, the gap between men and women has decreased  in all regions over the past 26 years.  


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The super bowl is often played in stadiums over 80,000 people how can tickets for the super bowl sell thousands of dollars when
Burka [1]
The new number, 200, is 400 less than the original number. What is the approximate percent change?
8 0
3 years ago
Describe political Islam's reaction to technological advancements.
MAXImum [283]

control and/or limit new technology

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not
Alborosie

Answer:

Explanation:

In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list alone is not acceptable.

“Americans often preferred not to think about the terrible war in Europe [the First World War]. By 1917, however, US citizens realized that ignoring the war or pretending it had nothing to do with them imperiled their future.

“. . . They realized that they had run out of options. Between 1914 and 1917, Americans had variously hoped that their nation could serve as an arbiter (as it had during the Russo-Japanese War, earning Theodore Roosevelt the country’s first Nobel Peace Prize), the leader of a global peace movement, the center of international arbitration, and the advocate of worldwide disarmament. By early 1917, however, the majority had come to two conclusions. First, as Charles Fremont Taylor, the editor of a Philadelphia-based magazine, articulated, ‘no nation can be a hermit in these days of steamships, railroads, telegraphs, ocean cables, wireless, etc.’ They no longer believed, as they had in 1914, that the Atlantic Ocean provided the country with sufficient protection from Europe’s wars. Second, they believed that their leaders had tried every option short of war only to find the country in an even more perilous geopolitical position.”

Michael S. Neiberg, historian, The Path to War: How the First World War Created Modern America, 2016

Using the excerpt, answer (a), (b), and (c).

(a) Briefly describe ONE piece of evidence used in the excerpt to support the argument made in the excerpt.

(b) Briefly explain how ONE piece of evidence not mentioned in the excerpt could be used to support, modify, or refute the argument in the excerpt.

(c) Briefly explain how ONE process discussed in the excerpt compares with the earlier United States decision to participate in the Spanish-American War.

Answer:



Explanation:



6 0
2 years ago
PLZ help me with this question!!
WITCHER [35]
Is anyone’s Brainly ads not working
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLZ ANSWER 25PTS
    15·2 answers
  • Please help with these questions:
    10·1 answer
  • Is adding food coloring and oil into water is it a chemical or physical change?
    15·2 answers
  • Match the anatomical reference to the correct body part: Group of answer choices
    14·1 answer
  • John repeatedly portrays jesus as _______________ old testament festivals.
    11·2 answers
  • Explain the major resources of energy and write its impoetance​
    13·1 answer
  • Which group in the Roman Republic's government had powers similar to a king's but served only one year? O A. Citizens O B. Consu
    10·1 answer
  • What is one reason why European explorers wanted to settle in North America? A Resources and economic opportunity B Less freedom
    12·1 answer
  • what might be the reason on increasing endemic, pandemic and epidemic diseases as impacts of climate change ? write any two​
    5·1 answer
  • discuss social factors (excluding friends and social interaction)that may contribute to unemployment in South Africa amongst the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!