1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natali [406]
3 years ago
11

A difference between Babur and Akbar was that Babur was the first emperor of the Mughal Empire, while Akbar was its greatest lea

der. Akbar was the first emperor of the Mughal Empire, while Babur was its greatest leader. Akbar was the first sultan of the Ottoman Empire, while Babur was its greatest leader. Babur was the first emperor of the Ottoman Empire, while Akbar was its greatest leader.
History
2 answers:
Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. Babur was the first emperor of the Mughal empire and Akbar was its greatest leader

Explanation:

alexdok [17]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is A. Babur was the first emperor of the Mughal empire and Akbar was its greatest leader.

Mughal empire founded in the subcontinent of India. Following its founder Babur the empire dated conventionally to the victory on the time of Humayun who succeeded Babur resulted to interruption by Sur empire.

Akbar was the great to the throne during the classic period of Mughal empire.

Later Akbar profounded a religion which was syncretic which was referred to as Din-ilahi.

You might be interested in
How did John Locke’s notion of the social contract influence the American colonists?
marin [14]
He primarily influenced the declaration of independence. His ideas made the colonists wonder about democracy and question their current government
4 0
3 years ago
Need help with US Government please help.
olga nikolaevna [1]
I think the answer is B.
5 0
2 years ago
Based on this addresses how do you think Lincoln would have dealt with southern returning to the union if he had lived to comple
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

Answer down below :))

Explanation:

Lincoln would have probably had his hands full. But, since the Emancipation Proclamation, this said that slaves were out of bounds. And so the southerners would have probably have not been able to deal with the crops in the area without the slaves.

8 0
2 years ago
Whos yall favourite ​
topjm [15]

Answer:

Yumeko Jabami

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls answer asp<br> Make it easy to understand pls
Marta_Voda [28]

is there a text I can read?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Discoveries in which field of science contributed most to the population booms of the 1800s
    8·1 answer
  • Here are the choices to my last post
    8·2 answers
  • What action occurred as a result of the XYZ Affair?
    14·2 answers
  • Match the vocabulary word with its meaning. 1. empirical a person who rules for life or by hereditary right 2. humanism a secula
    12·1 answer
  • Which of he following increased tension between amrica and the soviet union after world war 2
    9·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP DUE TODAY PLZ HELP ME!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • What role did Mazzini play in Italian Unification?
    8·2 answers
  • Many northerners were opposed to granting statehood to texas because
    13·1 answer
  • When might citizens be particularly concerned about an expansion of presidential power? when they support the president's agenda
    8·1 answer
  • In the early 1800s, which was most affected by the development of the steamboat?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!