<span>divide the numerator by the denominator to find its decimal equivalent.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
- <em>When we listen to the word "quotient", it means the solution to a division problem. </em>
- <em>An unknown number that has been multiplied by 2 is in the numerator because it came before the 7 in the statement. </em>
- <em>The number "7" is in the denominator because it came after the 2x in the statement. </em>
- <em>The word "is" represents an equal sign.</em>
- <em>The solution to the division problem (quotient) is 20. </em>
<u><em>If we put these clues together, we get 2x/7 = 20 as our translated equation.</em></u>
<u>Hence, our algebraic statement is 2x/7 = 20. The key is to listen to the statement. </u>

Answer:
FALSE, (2, 9) is not a solution to the set of inequalities given.
Step-by-step explanation:
Simply replace x by 2 and y by 9 in the inequalities and see if the inequality is true or not:
irst inequality:

so thi inequality is verified as true since 9 is larger or equal than 8
Now the second inequality:

This is FALSE since 9 is larger than 4 (not smaller)
Therefore the answer to the question is FALSE, (2, 9) is not a solution to the set of inequalities given.
The number is 1. 1 multiplied by 100 gives 100 as answer. Lisa claims that <span>when multiplying any number between 0 and 10 by 100, the product is greater than 100. In this case the answer is equal to 100 not greater than 100.
So this proof shows that Lisa's claim is not correct. </span>
15 - 1 = x thats the answer to the problem thats how you can have the answer