1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana66690 [7]
2 years ago
14

The fact that U.S. managers' salaries are substantially greater than those of comparable managers in Japan may be related to

History
2 answers:
Svetach [21]2 years ago
7 0
It may be related to the fact that there is an increase in the demand for CEOs in the US compared to Japan. So the correct answer here would be A.

The reason why this could be the correct answer is because if we need more CEOs then the companies would be also willing to pay more to ensure they are that company which gets the best CEOs.
Makovka662 [10]2 years ago
4 0
The fact that U.S. managers' salaries are substantially greater than those of comparable managers in Japan may be related to "<span>d. the greater number of public goods provided in the United States," since CEO salaries are usually tied to performance. </span>
You might be interested in
Which amendment to the u.s. constitution provides for separate balloting for president and vice president?
vlabodo [156]
That is going to be the 12th Amendment. 

I hope this helps!

Have a nice day!

^-^ 
5 0
3 years ago
What factors led the democrats to have gloomy prospect for the 1952 presidential election?
Vsevolod [243]
<span>1) Military deadlock in Korea over the matter of prisoner repatriation,
2) Harry Truman’s conflict with MacArthur - Truman relieved MacArthur of his command when the latter made public announcements contradictory to the administration's policies 
3) War-bred inflation - farm prices began to fall and continued for the next decade

</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What were the economic effects of the war​
Pie

Answer:

Cost of civil war

Civil war can have a devastating impact on the economic development of countries. Countries experiencing civil war will see a collapse in tourism, foreign investment and domestic investment. It can lead to shorter life-expectancy and lost GDP

8 0
2 years ago
Why would Paul Revere have changed the race of the man in the picture?​
Viktor [21]

Answer: Paul Revere would have changed the race of the man in the picture to show the rest of the colonies that the British are ruthless and they will do anything to keep up their nation.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Please help I will give extra points if you answer all correct and brainliest
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

The Virginia Plan was a proposal to establish a bicameral (two-branch) legislature in the newly founded United States. Drafted by James Madison in 1787, the plan recommended that states be represented based upon their population numbers, and it also called for the creation of three branches of government. While the Virginia Plan was not adopted in full, parts of the proposal were incorporated into the Great Compromise of 1787, which laid the foundation for the creation of the U.S. Constitution.

The states that supported the Virginia plan were large states like New york. The representatives knew that the provisions would give large states more influence in congress. Sen. Chistopher D. Martin(D-Ga) as well as Virginia, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina,...

The New Jersey Plan was a proposal for the structure of the U.S. federal government put forward by William Paterson at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The proposal was a response to the Virginia Plan, which Paterson believed would put too much power in large states to the disadvantage of smaller states. The small colonies supported the New Jersey Plan. They favored this plan because it proposed a Congress that was unicameral (having one house) and each state would have the same number of representatives or votes.

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, the Great Compromise of 1787, or the Sherman Compromise, was an agreement made between large and small states which partly defined the representation each state would have under the United States Constitution, as well as in legislature. It occurred in 1787. The Connecticut Compromise resulted from a debate among delegates on how each state could have representation in the Congress. The Great Compromise led to the creation of a two-chambered Congress. Also created was the House of Representative which is determined by a state’s population. The agreement retained the bicameral legislature, but the upper house had to change to accommodate two senators to represent each state. The deal reshaped the American government structure striking a balance between the highly populated states and their demands while at the same time taking into consideration the less-populous state and their interests.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Jesuits work to encourage the Catholic faith?
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please thank you
    13·2 answers
  • the tribes living in the mississippi river valley from around 800 A.D. until the 1500s were known for
    15·1 answer
  • Which british law required americans to house and feed british troops??
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence contains an error in subject-verb agreement? Each volunteer and staff member need to arrive at the scheduled time
    11·1 answer
  • What system carries the blood through the body​
    11·2 answers
  • What are some of the Cold War major events?
    7·2 answers
  • Alexander the Great throws a birthday party for his mom, Mrs. the Great. In between mouthfuls of cake and ice cream, washed down
    6·1 answer
  • 2. How did the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution give MORE political
    7·1 answer
  • Meet url: rhj-xirs-gmy​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!