The correct answer is A) Sir Walter Raleigh.
Sir Walter Raleigh was sent by Queen Elizabeth on three expeditions to the New World.
To do this task, Queen Elizabeth had one man and only one man: Sir Walter Raleigh (1552-1618). He had met Elizabeth when he was in the military and had a good relationship with the queen. In 1585, this explorer was named the captain of the Guard and received the order to explore new territories. So he planed and directed three important expeditions to the North American territory. Later in his life, he had problems with the Queen and was sent to prison.
The correct answer is a. raw materials and finished products were shipped quickly and cheaply.
When the railroads were created, it appeared to be one of the greatest phenomena during the industrial revolution. That was a great advance in the period of 1733 to 1878. And raw materials and finished products were shipped quickly and cheaply.
Answer:
Miranda vs Arizona: Miranda rights were added to the 5th amendment, which is the constitutional requirement for any law enforcement to read your Miranda rights to you. "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."
DC vs Heller: Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
Marbury vs Madison: Established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
Answer:
Admit the letter but instruct the jury that it is up to them to decide whether the letter is authentic.
Explanation:
The trial court should admit the letter but instruct the jury to decide its authenticity as that may affect their decision.