The Answer Is B because he is not trying to relate to the audience which would be Pathos and he is not using logic or information to convince the audience which is Logos Therefore it is Ethos , Ethos is using ethical appeal.
Answer:
Jo agrees to marry Professor Bhaer but would not marry Laurie is explained below in detail.
Explanation:
She was reluctant to consider the approach of any sort of passionate connection but said she loved him devotedly and that she did not think to ever marry anyone, indicating she loved him as a friend. Yet she also stated she felt he was “a fabulous chance too good” for her and after the novel she admired him to be the kind of man all should want to be – so the “she did not acknowledge that way about him” line is need to be discussed. Nevertheless, how could she have come to consider whatever emotions she might have for him as “right,” given her mother’s logic and her lack of experience?
Answer:
I think Esperanza did this because she was too embarrassed and already too overwhelmed by emotions to show which is her house, “And since I am shy, I don’t say anything, just hold out my hand with the letter.” (Cisneros 44) Unfortunately, since Esperanza admitted that the house next to the canteen is hers, this came with the consequence of Sister Superior not believing in the comment in the note since this means she doesn't need to walk far to get home.
Explanation:
The sentence which does not contain any
punctuation errors is:
<span><span>
A. </span><span>Waiting for my friends, I think that I arrived
too early. </span></span>
<span>
The sentence
is divided into dependent and independent clauses. The first clause is
dependent because it does not make sense and can’t stand alone without the
independent clause.</span>
Thats good :) im glad everyone enjoyed it
