1 or 3. I think its 1.
Answers 2, 4, and 5 is unreasonable and 1 and 3 make more since.
Go with answer 1 and 3. History shows those are probably true.
<h2> answer</h2>
-------------------
<h3>It provided a pseudoscientific justification for colonial domination based on racial superiority. ... It supported American imperialism within the Western Hemisphere, not outside it. It rejected military force and hastened the end of the conflict. </h3>
From the moment the first plane hit the North Tower, the immigration system in the United States was destined to change.
The attacks on September 11, 2001 certainly didn't start the country's immigration debate, but it did alter the course of the discussion.
Immigration was already a staple of the nightly news through the 1990s into the 2000s. After a series of free trade agreements realigned economies in Mexico and Central America, millions of migrants headed to northern Mexico and the U.S. looking for work.
"After 9/11, the Bush administration tried to see immigration enforcement as a way to fight terrorism," Burnham said. "And it's just not."
so the answer D
I believe the correct answer is segregation
