1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
3 years ago
14

After the missouri compromise, how many states were free states and how many were sklave states

History
1 answer:
melomori [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer - after the Missouri Compromise there were:

<h2>12 free states</h2><h2>12 slave states</h2>

The Missouri Compromise (1820) admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added as a free state at the same time, to keep the balance of slave and free states equal.  It also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.  

You might be interested in
Which of the following developments in the period circa 1250–1450 represents a situation that is the opposite of nomadic conquer
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

Conquered peoples being drawn into their conquerors' economic and cultural orbits, as illustrated by Turkic peoples converting to Islam and integrating into Muslim societies .

Explanation:

Few nomadic empires were solidified by placing a capital town inside a captured land and then they abused the business sources of that non-nomadic civilization. In that situation, the formerly nomadic regime may become culturally acclimated to the culture of the conquered country before it is eventually overthrew. The improvements were in the 13th century between 1330 and 1406.

7 0
3 years ago
How would you approach reconstruction ?
RoseWind [281]
Reconstruction lasted from 1863 to 1877, reconstruction abolished slavery and the communist. Reconstruction made the newly freed slaves have rights.
4 0
3 years ago
Which is the best example of a secondary source document useful in the study of history?
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

<h3>.scholars writing about historical event</h3><h3>.people,idea or object that will explain about the historical event</h3>

this are some examples of secondary source

4 0
3 years ago
Between 1960 and 1964, some white citizens protested with African Americans in the South in nonviolent actions. How did the resp
BigorU [14]

Answer:

2. They became increasingly violent, culminating in assault and murder.

Explanation:

Non-violence or passive resistance is a technique for social change that utilizes procedures. It is viewed as ethically legitimate to gently oppose unreasonable laws. Martin Luther King trusted that direct, non-violent protest action would force whites to confront segregation laws.

He made it generally acknowledged that individuals utilize quiet dissent to constrain changes to the law. Many white people upheld him and joined the protests.  

Protests were regularly met with police and open violence. Numerous individuals were killed, yet Dr. King did not bolster utilizing savaviolence ery as a type of opposition.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2 things that Federalists believed.
spayn [35]

<u>Beliefs of both Federalists and anti-federalists:</u>

After the proposal of the new Constitution in the United States in 1787, the process of ratification became a prime subjects of argument as there arose two side to debate on it. Those who were in favour of the ratification and activation of new Constitution were termed as Federalists whereas those who were not thinking so, called the anti-federalists. Here are the prime beliefs of both the sides.

The Prime beliefs of both sides on the new Constitution's ratification

Belief of Federalists:

  • The proposed Constitution was important for the survival and further development of the nation.
  • A strong Government was necessary to excel after the previous failed Confederations.

Belief of Non-Federalists:

  • The powers of the government, mentioned in the constitution was specifically granted and prohibited for doing more than that.
  • The powers were separated into three groups rather than giving the complete authority an individual to control tyranny.
  • The Constitution provided the system of checks and balances which wasn't required as all the branches were able to take care of their checks and balances.
  • The Constitution provided addendum powers to the federal courts at the expense of the domestic courts which was unfair.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following describes a major effect of World War I on Turkey?
    10·2 answers
  • How were the experiences of Jamestown settlers and Pilgrims alike? How were they different
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these manuscripts does not depict Matthew the Evangelist?
    9·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HELP QUICK IM TIMED
    11·1 answer
  • What do Columbus's sailors hope they gain on this great voyage? A.Peace in a new land B.Silver and Lumber C.Gold and Spices D.Pr
    13·1 answer
  • Which do economics describe the us economy as a mixed-market economy ?
    5·1 answer
  • Does the Rap battle discussion from the musical, Hamilton, accurately show Jefferson and Hamilton’s views on the economic plan f
    13·2 answers
  • Safavid shahs did all of the following EXCEPT a. follow Roman laws. b. be more available to their subjects. c. seize landed esta
    15·2 answers
  • Use the excerpt from Federalist, no. 84 to answer the question.
    15·1 answer
  • Write 3 sentences about autocracy?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!