<h2>The Horse Culture changed in a significant way the everyday life , hunting, mobilization and war. </h2>
In the second Colon's journey to America , <em>1493 arriving in 1496 to America,</em> the Catholic Kings decided to send to the American Continent horses. Those horses arrived to Dominican Republic. Once they were acclimatize, the spanish people took the foals to Central America, provinding horses to the new expeditions. Horses were taken to Peru, Chile and Argentina.
This foals taken to Central America, they found at the west side of america, the right place to reproduction<u> after the New Mexico war against the spanish.</u> The horses were released and living in freedom they spread all the way to Nort America, especially to the south west. The Mustangs were found in packs in the United States.
At first the natives were scared, they thought that the horse and the horse rider were a same being.
it was forbidden for them to ride horses, it was an exclusive spanish activity.
Apache Indians were the first to discover they could use horses to go hunting. They learnt how to ride and the other American Indians soon discover the same. They hunted buffalos: riding horses made them faster and help them to lead the buffalos packs to wherever they wanted to, making hunting easier.
Also this helped them in war: to defeat other tribes.
<h2>The horse improved every single activity in the natives lives.</h2>
Answer:
Both laws have striking similarities, but they also exhibit other differences as explained in the following
Explanation:
Both laws have striking similarities, but there are also vast differences. And the differences show how one is far superior to the other.
In the similarities both are sets of laws designed to help society function in ways so that it could prosper, and these laws contained particular civil rights.
They both share in the protection of marriage, family, property damage, injury, murder, robbery, theft, kidnapping and even in commerce, so they both act as stabilizers of society.
Here are some differences between both.
The source of the Book of the hebrew Covenant is God; the source for the Hammurabi laws is Hammurabi the Babylonian king in ancient Mesopotamia. The hebrew Covenant protects the disenfranchised members of society, regardless of their place or rank in society, while the Code of Hammurabi is interested only in the free men class and gives special protection to the middle and higher social classes of Babylon. Another difference was the fact that God was interested in creating a kingdom of priests, a holy nation in the hebrew law, but Hammurabi’s motivation is for prosperity and longevity on the throne.
It would be D.land was divided among families with a tribe and treated like private property.
The correct answer for this question is "Industrial Revolution." Industrial Revolution <span>event opened Asian countries, particularly China, to trade with Europe.
</span>
The correct answer for this question is "they had superior communication, technology, and weapons." European nations were able to dominate other countries during the period of colonialism because <span>they had superior communication, technology, and weapons.</span>
