<em><u>D) Millions of Americans volunteered for World War II to escape poverty. </u></em>
The number one argument against immigrant labor is that they will take job opportunities away from Americans and cause an overall drop in wages. However, <u>this is probably the easiest misconception to debunk</u>, as immigrants are more often inclined to settle in less populated regions and actually help increase supply and demand generating even more job opportunities. In addition, many studies show that immigrants usually just compete against each other for less-skill positions and companies keep favoring the hiring of locals.
Hope this helps!
Northern strategists viewed the Mississippi River and its tributaries as vital to a Union victory in the Civil War because control of it would split the South in half.
During the Civil War, taking control of the Mississippi River became one of the main objectives for the North. On July 4, 1863 after a forty-day siege, Vicksburg was taken by General Ulysses S. Grant, which allowed the Union to control the river and divide the Confederacy into two.
In the long term, the Mongol-enforced movement of conquered peoples from their homelands to distant parts of the empire facilitated the exchange of ideas and techniques, as exemplified by the flow of Chinese technology and artistic conventions westward to the Middle East and Europe
<span>The answer is that in each of these eras the person struggling with poverty would be generally treated the same, that is to say mostly rejected by society and given few options to improve their financial situation. Impoverished people are referred to as paupers and historical documentation repeatedly refers to them as a negative aspect of society.</span>