Answer:
people would be willing to risk their lives for democracy because they want to keep their equality and freedom. if these traits were stripped away from the individual, they would not be satisfied and democracy also creates more order as opposed to chaos such as an anarchy.
The first was the great bubonic plague which happened in 1665. This was the last great epidemic of the plague which swept through London and killed over 100 000 people which was more than 20% of the population of the time. It also swept through many parts of Southern England and killed even more if we count those victims too.
The second was the Great Fire of London which happened less than a year later in 1966. The fire was so huge that it burned down the homes of approximately 70 000 people, which is important because the whole population of the city was 80 000. Over 13 000 houses were burned to the ground as well as almost a 100 churches.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the first one, having to do with Carter being disliked during his time in office but generally liked now, since as President he was viewed as being rather ineffectual. </span></span>
Easy money/sound money. It was bimetallism or free silver was what he based his policy on for president. I hope this helps.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
gib me brainliest plz even if wrong